3,273,606
edits
δευτερόπρωτος: Difference between revisions
T21
(strοng) |
(T21) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
{{StrongGR | {{StrongGR | ||
|strgr=from [[δεύτερος]] and [[πρῶτος]]; [[second]]-[[first]], i.e. ([[specially]]) a [[designation]] of the Sabbath [[immediately]] [[after]] the Paschal week ([[being]] the [[second]] [[after]] Passover [[day]], and the [[first]] of the [[seven]] Sabbaths [[intervening]] [[before]] Pentecost): [[second]] … [[after]] the [[first]]. | |strgr=from [[δεύτερος]] and [[πρῶτος]]; [[second]]-[[first]], i.e. ([[specially]]) a [[designation]] of the Sabbath [[immediately]] [[after]] the Paschal week ([[being]] the [[second]] [[after]] Passover [[day]], and the [[first]] of the [[seven]] Sabbaths [[intervening]] [[before]] Pentecost): [[second]] … [[after]] the [[first]]. | ||
}} | |||
{{Thayer | |||
|txtha=[[δευτερόπρωτον]], [[second]]-[[first]] (cf. δευτερεσχατος [[second]]-[[last]], [[last]] [[but]] [[one]]): ἐν σαββάτῳ δευτεροπρώτῳ in the [[second]] of the [[first]] sabbaths [[after]] the [[feast]] of the Passover; cf. Redslob in the Intelligenzblatt zur Hall. Lit. Zeit. 1847, N. 70; Ewald, Jahrbb. d. Biblical Wissensch. i., p. 72; (WH's Appendix, at the [[passage]]). The [[various]] opinions of others are reviewed by Meyer (and McClellan) at the [[passage]] and Lübkert in the Studien und Kritiken for 1835, p. 664ff (Eustrat. in vita Eutych. n. 95 calls the [[first]] Sunday [[after]] Easter δευτεροπρωτην κυριακην). (But the [[genuineness]] of the [[word]] is [[questionable]]. It is [[lacking]] in א B L 1,33, 69 and [[some]] [[other]] authorities. Hence, Tr [[text]] WH [[omit]] the [[word]]; L Tr marginal [[reading]] brackets it. Tischendorf, [[after]] expunging it in his 2nd edition, restored it in his 7th edition, [[subsequently]] [[put]] it in brackets, and [[finally]] (8th edition) inserted it [[again]]. It is questioned or discarded, by Meyer, Bleek, Alford, Weiss (on Mark , p. 101), Holtz., Hilgenf., Volkm., Farrar ([[commentary]] at the [[passage]] and Life of Christ 1:435), others. For the [[evidence]] [[see]] Tdf. s [[note]], and for discussions of it [[see]] WH s Appendix at the [[passage]]; Scrivener, Introduction, p. 515f; Green, Developed Criticism at the [[passage]].) | |||
}} | }} | ||