συνοκωχότε: Difference between revisions

2b
(11)
 
(2b)
Line 9: Line 9:
|Beta Code=sunokwxo/te
|Beta Code=sunokwxo/te
|Definition=<span class="sense"><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span class="bld">A</span> v. [[συνόχωκα]].</span>
|Definition=<span class="sense"><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span class="bld">A</span> v. [[συνόχωκα]].</span>
}}
{{etym
|etymtx=Grammatical information: ptc.<br />Meaning: <b class="b2">grown together, bent together</b> (Β 218); after it <b class="b3">συνοχωκότος</b> (gen. sg.) [[collapsed]] (Q. S. 7, 502).<br />Other forms: Perf. ptc. du.<br />Origin: GR [a formation built with Greek elements]<br />Etymology: To <b class="b3">συνέχω</b>, but explanation further unclear. After Brugmann (e.g. IF 13, 280) reduplicated formation like <b class="b3">συν-οκωχή</b>, [[ἀνοκωχή]] (s. v.) a.o. As however the reading <b class="b3">συνοχωκότε</b> seems more reliable, Wackernagel Gött. Nachr. 1902, 738f. (Kl. Schr. 1, 128f.) assumes a denominative <b class="b3">*συνοχόω</b> (from <b class="b3">σύνοχος</b>), which is however not unproblematic; cf. Schwyzer 766 n. 6 (w. lit.), where <b class="b3">συνοχωκότε</b> is supposed to be an enlargement of <b class="b3">*συνοχότε</b> (to *[<b class="b3">σ]ε[σ]οχα</b>). The form is rather to be understood as an articial formation to <b class="b3">συνέχω</b>, which on the one hand through rhythmical parallels (<b class="b3">κεκορηότε</b>, <b class="b3">κεκοτηότι</b>, <b class="b3">βεβαρηότα</b> a.o.), on the other hand through reduplicated forms as <b class="b3">ὄρωρα</b> and trough <b class="b3">κ-</b>perfects as <b class="b3">μέμβλωκα</b> could have been favoured. A natural word was <b class="b3">συνοχωκότε</b> certainly not. For intensive meaning Hartmann Festschr. Snell 250. -- Cf. also Chantraine Gramm. hom. 1, 424 m. n. 3.
}}
}}