3,277,073
edits
(1) |
m (Text replacement - "''' <b class="num">1)" to "'''<br /><b class="num">1)") |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{elru | {{elru | ||
|elrutext='''γαμψός:''' <b class="num">1)</b> загнутый, изогнутый, кривой (κέρατα, ὄνυχες, ὀδόντες Arst.; [[ἄγκιστρον]], [[δρέπανον]] Anth.);<br /><b class="num">2)</b> с кривыми когтями (οἰωνοί Arph.). | |elrutext='''γαμψός:'''<br /><b class="num">1)</b> загнутый, изогнутый, кривой (κέρατα, ὄνυχες, ὀδόντες Arst.; [[ἄγκιστρον]], [[δρέπανον]] Anth.);<br /><b class="num">2)</b> с кривыми когтями (οἰωνοί Arph.). | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{etym | {{etym | ||
|etymtx=Grammatical information: adj.<br />Meaning: [[curved]], [[crooked]] (Ar.)<br />Compounds: <b class="b3">γαμψῶνυξ</b> (Il.), <b class="b3">γαμψώνυχος</b> (Epich.) <b class="b2">w. curved claws</b>.<br />Derivatives: <b class="b3">γαμψόομαι</b> (Arist.), <b class="b3">γαμψωλή</b> (H.).<br />Origin: PG [a word of Pre-Greek origin]<br />Etymology: It seems evident to connect [[γνάμπτω]] (q. v.). The absence of the <b class="b3">-ν-</b> was explained as dissimilation, if <b class="b3">γαμψός</b> is a backformation from <b class="b3">γαμψώνυχ(ο</b>)- (Leumann Hom. Wörter 156); this is improbable and must be rejected. (It is an explanation to avoid certain conclusions; we should rather explain these conclusions). Nor a contamination of <b class="b3">γνάμπτω</b> and <b class="b3">κάμπτω</b> (Güntert Reimwortbildungen 115f.). I think we rather have to connect (a variant of) <b class="b3">κάμπτω</b>. Also, the question remains about the relation between [[κάμπτω]] and [[γνάμπτω]]. I think all these words are Pre-Greek; s.vv. | |etymtx=Grammatical information: adj.<br />Meaning: [[curved]], [[crooked]] (Ar.)<br />Compounds: <b class="b3">γαμψῶνυξ</b> (Il.), <b class="b3">γαμψώνυχος</b> (Epich.) <b class="b2">w. curved claws</b>.<br />Derivatives: <b class="b3">γαμψόομαι</b> (Arist.), <b class="b3">γαμψωλή</b> (H.).<br />Origin: PG [a word of Pre-Greek origin]<br />Etymology: It seems evident to connect [[γνάμπτω]] (q. v.). The absence of the <b class="b3">-ν-</b> was explained as dissimilation, if <b class="b3">γαμψός</b> is a backformation from <b class="b3">γαμψώνυχ(ο</b>)- (Leumann Hom. Wörter 156); this is improbable and must be rejected. (It is an explanation to avoid certain conclusions; we should rather explain these conclusions). Nor a contamination of <b class="b3">γνάμπτω</b> and <b class="b3">κάμπτω</b> (Güntert Reimwortbildungen 115f.). I think we rather have to connect (a variant of) <b class="b3">κάμπτω</b>. Also, the question remains about the relation between [[κάμπτω]] and [[γνάμπτω]]. I think all these words are Pre-Greek; s.vv. | ||
}} | }} |