3,276,318
edits
(3) |
m (Text replacement - "(?s)({{Lewis.*?}}\n)({{.*}}\n)({{LaEn.*?}}$)" to "$3 $1$2") |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{LaEn | |||
|lnetxt=soloecismus soloecismi N M :: mistake in grammar, solecism | |||
}} | |||
{{Lewis | {{Lewis | ||
|lshtext=<b>sŏloecismus</b>: (sŏlĭcismus, Aus. Epigr. 138), i, m., = [[σολοικισμός]].<br /><b>I</b> Lit., a grammatical [[fault]] in the [[construction]] of a [[sentence]], a [[solecism]] (cf. [[stribligo]]): vitia in sermone, quo [[minus]] is [[Latinus]] [[sit]], duo possunt esse: [[soloecismus]] et [[barbarismus]]. Soloecismus est, cum in verbis pluribus [[consequens]] [[verbum]] superiori non accommodatur. Barbarismus est, cum [[verbum]] aliquod [[vitiose]] effertur, Auct. Her. 4, 12, 17; cf. Sinn. [[Capito]] ap. Gell. 5, 20, 1 ([[who]] called it, in [[pure]] Latin, [[imparilitas]]); Quint. 1, 5, 16; 1, 5, 36 sq.; Sen. Suas. 2, § 13; Gell. 1, 7, 3; Juv. 6, 452; Aus. Epigr. 138; Tert. adv. Nat. 1, 3.—<br /><b>II</b> Transf., a [[fault]], in gen., Mart. 11, 19, 2: [[apud]] Christianos [[soloecismus]] est [[magnus]] et [[vitium]], turpe [[quid]] vel narrare vel facere, Hier. in Helv. 16. | |lshtext=<b>sŏloecismus</b>: (sŏlĭcismus, Aus. Epigr. 138), i, m., = [[σολοικισμός]].<br /><b>I</b> Lit., a grammatical [[fault]] in the [[construction]] of a [[sentence]], a [[solecism]] (cf. [[stribligo]]): vitia in sermone, quo [[minus]] is [[Latinus]] [[sit]], duo possunt esse: [[soloecismus]] et [[barbarismus]]. Soloecismus est, cum in verbis pluribus [[consequens]] [[verbum]] superiori non accommodatur. Barbarismus est, cum [[verbum]] aliquod [[vitiose]] effertur, Auct. Her. 4, 12, 17; cf. Sinn. [[Capito]] ap. Gell. 5, 20, 1 ([[who]] called it, in [[pure]] Latin, [[imparilitas]]); Quint. 1, 5, 16; 1, 5, 36 sq.; Sen. Suas. 2, § 13; Gell. 1, 7, 3; Juv. 6, 452; Aus. Epigr. 138; Tert. adv. Nat. 1, 3.—<br /><b>II</b> Transf., a [[fault]], in gen., Mart. 11, 19, 2: [[apud]] Christianos [[soloecismus]] est [[magnus]] et [[vitium]], turpe [[quid]] vel narrare vel facere, Hier. in Helv. 16. | ||
Line 7: | Line 10: | ||
{{Georges | {{Georges | ||
|georg=soloecismus, ī, m. ([[σολοικισμός]]), I) die [[grammatisch]] unrichtige [[Verbindung]] der Wörter, der [[Solözismus]], Cornif. rhet. 4, 17. Quint. 1, 5, 16 ([[neben]] [[barbarismus]]). [[Sinn]]. Capit. b. Gell. 5, 20 (der ihn [[rein]] lat. [[imparilitas]] nennt). Sen. suas. 2, 13 u. contr. 9. praef. § 3. Sen. ep. 95, 9. Gell. 1, 7, 3. Iuven. 6, 456. Tert. ad nat. 1, 3. Apul. flor. 9. p. 9, 14 Kr. Diom. 453, 21. Isid. orig. 1, 32. no. 1 sqq.: barbarismis, soloecismis obsitae sunt [[res]] vestrae et vitiorum deformitate pollutae, Arnob. 1, 59: scherzh. [[bei]] Mart. 11, 19, 2. – II) der [[Verstoß]] [[gegen]] gute [[Lebensart]] ([[Sitte]]), -[[gegen]] den [[Anstand]], [[Hieron]]. in Helv. 16. | |georg=soloecismus, ī, m. ([[σολοικισμός]]), I) die [[grammatisch]] unrichtige [[Verbindung]] der Wörter, der [[Solözismus]], Cornif. rhet. 4, 17. Quint. 1, 5, 16 ([[neben]] [[barbarismus]]). [[Sinn]]. Capit. b. Gell. 5, 20 (der ihn [[rein]] lat. [[imparilitas]] nennt). Sen. suas. 2, 13 u. contr. 9. praef. § 3. Sen. ep. 95, 9. Gell. 1, 7, 3. Iuven. 6, 456. Tert. ad nat. 1, 3. Apul. flor. 9. p. 9, 14 Kr. Diom. 453, 21. Isid. orig. 1, 32. no. 1 sqq.: barbarismis, soloecismis obsitae sunt [[res]] vestrae et vitiorum deformitate pollutae, Arnob. 1, 59: scherzh. [[bei]] Mart. 11, 19, 2. – II) der [[Verstoß]] [[gegen]] gute [[Lebensart]] ([[Sitte]]), -[[gegen]] den [[Anstand]], [[Hieron]]. in Helv. 16. | ||
}} | }} |