3,276,901
edits
(1b) |
(1ab) |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
{{etym | {{etym | ||
|etymtx=Grammatical information: only dat. <b class="b3">ἰότητι</b> (Hom., A. R.; <b class="b3">ἰότατι</b> Alc. <b class="b3">α</b> 309 L.P., A. Pr. 558 [lyr.]) except <b class="b3">ἰότητα Ο</b> 41, about [[will]], [[decision]] (<b class="b3">θεῶν ἰότητι</b> etc.). On the use in Homer Krarup Class. et. Med. 10, 13).<br />Origin: IE [Indo-European]X [probably] [16] <b class="b2">*h₂eis-</b> [[wish]]<br />Etymology: Uncertain. Two hypotheses: 1. to Skt. <b class="b2">iṣ-</b> [[wish]] (pres. <b class="b2">iccháti</b>), either from <b class="b2">*iso-tāt-</b> (Curtius 402; thus Schwyzer 528 n. 8) or <b class="b2">*isto-tāt-</b> from the ptc. <b class="b2">*istós</b> = Skt. <b class="b2">iṣṭá-</b> [[wished]] (Chantr. Form. 294); 2. to <b class="b3">ἵεμαι</b> [[hasten]], [[desire]] from <b class="b3">*Ϝιό-της</b> or, with haplological hortening, <b class="b3">*Ϝιοτό-της</b>, from <b class="b3">*Ϝίοτος</b> [[wishing]] = Lat. (<b class="b2">in-)vītus</b> (s. on <b class="b3">ἵεμαι</b>; Sommer Lautstud. 12f.); however, <b class="b3">ἵεμαι</b> has a long [[i]]. - Improbable Leumann Hom. Wörter 127ff. (with criticism on the preceding), who explains <b class="b3">ἰότητι</b> from a false division of <b class="b3">δηιοτῆτι</b> (<b class="b3">-τος</b>) [[enmity]] in <b class="b3">δη ἰότητι</b> (<b class="b3">-τος</b>); the Boeot. PN <b class="b3">Θειο-Ϝίοτος</b>, which speaks strongly for an original <b class="b3">Ϝιότητι</b>, would have been built on ep. <b class="b3">θεῶν ἰότητι</b>; against Leumann Fraenkel Gnomon 23, 373. | |etymtx=Grammatical information: only dat. <b class="b3">ἰότητι</b> (Hom., A. R.; <b class="b3">ἰότατι</b> Alc. <b class="b3">α</b> 309 L.P., A. Pr. 558 [lyr.]) except <b class="b3">ἰότητα Ο</b> 41, about [[will]], [[decision]] (<b class="b3">θεῶν ἰότητι</b> etc.). On the use in Homer Krarup Class. et. Med. 10, 13).<br />Origin: IE [Indo-European]X [probably] [16] <b class="b2">*h₂eis-</b> [[wish]]<br />Etymology: Uncertain. Two hypotheses: 1. to Skt. <b class="b2">iṣ-</b> [[wish]] (pres. <b class="b2">iccháti</b>), either from <b class="b2">*iso-tāt-</b> (Curtius 402; thus Schwyzer 528 n. 8) or <b class="b2">*isto-tāt-</b> from the ptc. <b class="b2">*istós</b> = Skt. <b class="b2">iṣṭá-</b> [[wished]] (Chantr. Form. 294); 2. to <b class="b3">ἵεμαι</b> [[hasten]], [[desire]] from <b class="b3">*Ϝιό-της</b> or, with haplological hortening, <b class="b3">*Ϝιοτό-της</b>, from <b class="b3">*Ϝίοτος</b> [[wishing]] = Lat. (<b class="b2">in-)vītus</b> (s. on <b class="b3">ἵεμαι</b>; Sommer Lautstud. 12f.); however, <b class="b3">ἵεμαι</b> has a long [[i]]. - Improbable Leumann Hom. Wörter 127ff. (with criticism on the preceding), who explains <b class="b3">ἰότητι</b> from a false division of <b class="b3">δηιοτῆτι</b> (<b class="b3">-τος</b>) [[enmity]] in <b class="b3">δη ἰότητι</b> (<b class="b3">-τος</b>); the Boeot. PN <b class="b3">Θειο-Ϝίοτος</b>, which speaks strongly for an original <b class="b3">Ϝιότητι</b>, would have been built on ep. <b class="b3">θεῶν ἰότητι</b>; against Leumann Fraenkel Gnomon 23, 373. | ||
}} | |||
{{mdlsj | |||
|mdlsjtxt=[[ἰότης]], ητος,<br /><b class="num">I.</b> [[will]], [[desire]], [[θεῶν]] ἰότητι by the [[will]] or hest of the gods, Hom.<br /><b class="num">II.</b> = [[ἕκατι]] II, for the [[sake]] of, ἰότᾱτι γάμων Aesch. [deriv. uncertain] | |||
}} | }} |