3,258,369
edits
ἔθων: Difference between revisions
From LSJ
1b
(Bailly1_2) |
(1b) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{bailly | {{bailly | ||
|btext=<i>part. prés. de</i> [[ἔθω]]. | |btext=<i>part. prés. de</i> [[ἔθω]]. | ||
}} | |||
{{etym | |||
|etymtx=Grammatical information: adj.<br />Meaning: in <b class="b3">χλούνην σῦν ἄγριον</b> ... <b class="b3">ὅς κακὰ πόλλ</b>' <b class="b3">ἔρδεσκεν ἔθων Οἰνῆος ἀλωήν</b> (Ι 540), pl. <b class="b3">σφήκεσσιν ἐοικότες</b> ..., <b class="b3">οὕς παῖδες ἐριδμαίνουσιν ἔθοντες</b> (Π 260).<br />Origin: XX [etym. unknown]<br />Etymology: In antiquity = <b class="b3">βλάπτων</b>, <b class="b3">φθείρων</b>, or <b class="b3">ἐρεθίζοντες</b>; also <b class="b3">ἔθει φθείρει</b>, <b class="b3">ἐρεθίζει</b> H. Others connected <b class="b3">εἴωθα</b> <b class="b2">is used</b>. - Against the last interpretation can be said, that beside the old perfect <b class="b3">εἴωθα</b> indicating a situation there is no other form, and that the construction conflicts with that of <b class="b3">εἴωθα</b>, and that a translation <b class="b2">acting conform his character</b> v. t., from a swine is strange. Still this seems to fit very well. Doubtful also K. Fr. W. Schmidt KZ 45, 231ff. connected <b class="b3">ἔθων</b> as present to <b class="b3">ὠθέω</b>. Cf. also Leumann Hom. Wörter 212f. - Diff. on <b class="b3">ἔθω</b> (to <b class="b3">εἴωθα</b>, <b class="b3">ἔθος</b>) Bechtel Lex. s. v. DELG prefers <b class="b3">βλάπτων</b> (which seems rejected by <b class="b3">ἐριδμαίνουσι</b>). Not to <b class="b3">ἔθρις</b>. | |||
}} | }} | ||
