3,277,002
edits
μῶνυξ: Difference between revisions
From LSJ
2
(3) |
(2) |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
{{elru | {{elru | ||
|elrutext='''μῶνυξ:''' ῠχος adj. [[μόνος]] + [[ὄνυξ]] однокопытный (эпитет коня) Hom.; непарнокопытный (ὕες Arst.). | |elrutext='''μῶνυξ:''' ῠχος adj. [[μόνος]] + [[ὄνυξ]] однокопытный (эпитет коня) Hom.; непарнокопытный (ὕες Arst.). | ||
}} | |||
{{etym | |||
|etymtx=-υχος<br />Grammatical information: adj.<br />Meaning: <b class="b2">with one hoof</b>, mostly plur. of horses as opposed to cattle and sheep with split hooves (Hom., Hdt., Arist.); on the stemformation Sommer Nominalkomp. 96 ff.<br />Origin: IE [Indo-European] [902] <b class="b2">*sm̥-h₃nugʰ-</b><br />Etymology: Acc. to the ancients from <b class="b3">*μονϜ(ο)-ονυξ</b> wit syllable-dissimilation and ev. lengthening in compounds (cf. <b class="b3">μον-όφθαλ-μος</b> <b class="b2">one-eyed</b> etc.), which is defended by Runes Glotta 19, 286 f. Since de Saussure Rec. 266 however generally derived from <b class="b3">*σμ-ῶνυξ</b> with old zero grade of IE <b class="b2">*sem-</b> in <b class="b2">eĩs</b> [[one]] (s.v.). If right, <b class="b3">μῶνυξ</b> must be quite old and like <b class="b3">μ-ία</b> (= Arm. [[mi]]) go back to pre-Greek times, "was nicht besonders wahrscheinlich ist" (Frisk). For <b class="b3">μόν(Ϝ)ος</b> one would have expected <b class="b3">οἶ(Ϝ)ος</b> (Schwyzer 433 n.3). For <b class="b3">*σμ-ῶνυξ</b> a.o. Wackernagel KZ 28, 137 (= Kl. Schr. 1, 619), Bechtel Lex. 230, Brugmann4 198, Risch $ 81, Lejeune Traité de phon. 102, Schwyzer 588 w. n. 3. The reconstructed form must be <b class="b2">*sm̥-h₃nugh-</b> > <b class="b3">μω-νυχ-</b>; Beekes, Orbis 20(1971)138 - 142. | |||
}} | }} | ||
