3,270,813
edits
ὀξίνα: Difference between revisions
From LSJ
2a
(2b) |
(2a) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
{{etym | {{etym | ||
|etymtx=Grammatical information: f.<br />Meaning: <b class="b3">ἐργαλεῖόν τι γεωργικόν</b>, <b class="b3">σιδηροῦς γόμφους ἔχον</b>, <b class="b3">ἑλκόμενον ὑπὸ βοῶν</b> H.<br />Origin: XX [etym. unknown]<br />Etymology: Not to be separated from the IE word for [[harrow]] in Lat. [[occa]], Celt., e.g. Welsh [[oged]], Germ., e.g. OHG [[egida]] ([[Egge]] innovation), Balt., e.g. Lith. <b class="b2">akė́čios</b> (<b class="b2">ek-</b>), IE <b class="b2">*oketā</b> (Lat. [[occa]] unclear)(?); perh. reshaped after <b class="b3">ὀξύς</b> and with ending as in <b class="b3">ἀξίνη</b> [[axe]], but this has a long <b class="b3">ι</b>, while here the length is unknown; Pre-Greek has a suffix <b class="b3">-ιν-</b>. -- WP. 1, 31 f., Pok. 22, W.-Hofmann and Ernout-Meillet s. [[occa]], Fraenkel s. <b class="b2">ekė́čios</b>. (The further connection with the word for [[eye]] in <b class="b3">ὄσσε</b> etc. (Specht KZ 62, 210ff., Ursprung 345, Fraenkel l.c.) is impossible because of the velar: IE <b class="b2">*ok-</b> against <b class="b2">okʷ-</b>). The word supposed to be <b class="b2">a\/ok-et-</b> (Pok. 22) is itself doubtful, as it occurs only in Germanic, Celtic and Lithuanian (Lat. [[occa]] is not quite clear). | |etymtx=Grammatical information: f.<br />Meaning: <b class="b3">ἐργαλεῖόν τι γεωργικόν</b>, <b class="b3">σιδηροῦς γόμφους ἔχον</b>, <b class="b3">ἑλκόμενον ὑπὸ βοῶν</b> H.<br />Origin: XX [etym. unknown]<br />Etymology: Not to be separated from the IE word for [[harrow]] in Lat. [[occa]], Celt., e.g. Welsh [[oged]], Germ., e.g. OHG [[egida]] ([[Egge]] innovation), Balt., e.g. Lith. <b class="b2">akė́čios</b> (<b class="b2">ek-</b>), IE <b class="b2">*oketā</b> (Lat. [[occa]] unclear)(?); perh. reshaped after <b class="b3">ὀξύς</b> and with ending as in <b class="b3">ἀξίνη</b> [[axe]], but this has a long <b class="b3">ι</b>, while here the length is unknown; Pre-Greek has a suffix <b class="b3">-ιν-</b>. -- WP. 1, 31 f., Pok. 22, W.-Hofmann and Ernout-Meillet s. [[occa]], Fraenkel s. <b class="b2">ekė́čios</b>. (The further connection with the word for [[eye]] in <b class="b3">ὄσσε</b> etc. (Specht KZ 62, 210ff., Ursprung 345, Fraenkel l.c.) is impossible because of the velar: IE <b class="b2">*ok-</b> against <b class="b2">okʷ-</b>). The word supposed to be <b class="b2">a\/ok-et-</b> (Pok. 22) is itself doubtful, as it occurs only in Germanic, Celtic and Lithuanian (Lat. [[occa]] is not quite clear). | ||
}} | |||
{{FriskDe | |||
|ftr='''ὀξίνα''': {oksína}<br />'''Meaning''': ἐργαλεῖόν τι γεωργικόν, [[σιδηροῦς]] γόμφους [[ἔχον]], ἑλκόμενον ὑπὸ [[βοῶν]] H.<br />'''Etymology''' : Von dem idg. Wort für [[Egge]] in lat. ''occa'', kelt., z.B. kymr. ''oged'', germ., z.B. ahd. ''egida'' (''Egge'' Neubildung), balt., z.B. lit. ''akė́čios'' (''ek''-), idg. *''oketā'' (lat. ''occa'' unklar), nicht zu trennen; wohl nach [[ὀξύς]] umgebildet und mit Abgang wie in [[ἀξίνη]] [[Axt]]. — WP. 1, 31 f., Pok. 22, W.-Hofmann und Ernout-Meillet s. ''occa'', Fraenkel s. ''ekė́čios''. Die weitere Anknüpfung an das Wort für [[Auge]] in [[ὄσσε]] usw. (Specht KZ 62, 210ff., Ursprung 345, Fraenkel a. O.) scheitert schon an dem Guttural (idg. ''ok''- gegen ''oqʷ''-).<br />'''Page''' 2,399 | |||
}} | }} | ||
