Anonymous

δέελος: Difference between revisions

From LSJ
m
Text replacement - "(*UTF)(*UCP)<b class="b3">(\w+)<\/b>" to "$1"
(1a)
m (Text replacement - "(*UTF)(*UCP)<b class="b3">(\w+)<\/b>" to "$1")
Line 8: Line 8:
|Transliteration C=deelos
|Transliteration C=deelos
|Beta Code=de/elos
|Beta Code=de/elos
|Definition=η, ον, resolved form of <b class="b3">δῆλος</b>, <span class="bibl">Il.10.466</span>. <span class="sense">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span class="bld">II</span> = [[δεσμός]], [[ἅμμα]], Hsch. δεήλαδες· <b class="b3">φύλακες</b>, Id.</span>
|Definition=η, ον, resolved form of [[δῆλος]], <span class="bibl">Il.10.466</span>. <span class="sense">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span class="bld">II</span> = [[δεσμός]], [[ἅμμα]], Hsch. δεήλαδες· [[φύλακες]], Id.</span>
}}
}}
{{pape
{{pape
Line 38: Line 38:
}}
}}
{{etym
{{etym
|etymtx=Grammatical information: m.<br />Meaning: [[binding]]? only K 466. <b class="b3">δέελος δεσμός</b>, <b class="b3">ἅμμα</b> H.<br />Origin: IE [Indo-European] [183] <b class="b2">*deh₁-</b> [[bind]]<br />Etymology: Ruijgh, Lingua 25 (1970) 319 (s.v. <b class="b3">δῆλος</b>) thinks that the identification of <b class="b3">δέελος</b> with <b class="b3">δῆλος</b> is a mistake of ancient grammarians. Note that <b class="b3">δέαλος</b> could well have been used in this place. "the presence of <b class="b3">τε</b> after <b class="b3">σῆμα</b> obliges to see <b class="b3">δέελον</b> as a substantive." Hesychius gives the right form. It is derived from <b class="b3">δέω</b> [[bind]], with the suffix <b class="b3">-ελο-</b>, i.e. <b class="b2">*deh₁-elo-</b>. It could have meant (French) [[lien]]. (He also gives another possibility, which seems less probable to me.) Cf. also [[δῆλος]].
|etymtx=Grammatical information: m.<br />Meaning: [[binding]]? only K 466. <b class="b3">δέελος δεσμός</b>, [[ἅμμα]] H.<br />Origin: IE [Indo-European] [183] <b class="b2">*deh₁-</b> [[bind]]<br />Etymology: Ruijgh, Lingua 25 (1970) 319 (s.v. [[δῆλος]]) thinks that the identification of [[δέελος]] with [[δῆλος]] is a mistake of ancient grammarians. Note that [[δέαλος]] could well have been used in this place. "the presence of [[τε]] after [[σῆμα]] obliges to see [[δέελον]] as a substantive." Hesychius gives the right form. It is derived from [[δέω]] [[bind]], with the suffix <b class="b3">-ελο-</b>, i.e. <b class="b2">*deh₁-elo-</b>. It could have meant (French) [[lien]]. (He also gives another possibility, which seems less probable to me.) Cf. also [[δῆλος]].
}}
}}
{{mdlsj
{{mdlsj