3,277,172
edits
(1a) |
m (Text replacement - "(*UTF)(*UCP)<b class="b3">(\w+)<\/b>" to "$1") |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|Transliteration C=deelos | |Transliteration C=deelos | ||
|Beta Code=de/elos | |Beta Code=de/elos | ||
|Definition=η, ον, resolved form of | |Definition=η, ον, resolved form of [[δῆλος]], <span class="bibl">Il.10.466</span>. <span class="sense"> <span class="bld">II</span> = [[δεσμός]], [[ἅμμα]], Hsch. δεήλαδες· [[φύλακες]], Id.</span> | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{pape | {{pape | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{etym | {{etym | ||
|etymtx=Grammatical information: m.<br />Meaning: [[binding]]? only K 466. <b class="b3">δέελος δεσμός</b>, | |etymtx=Grammatical information: m.<br />Meaning: [[binding]]? only K 466. <b class="b3">δέελος δεσμός</b>, [[ἅμμα]] H.<br />Origin: IE [Indo-European] [183] <b class="b2">*deh₁-</b> [[bind]]<br />Etymology: Ruijgh, Lingua 25 (1970) 319 (s.v. [[δῆλος]]) thinks that the identification of [[δέελος]] with [[δῆλος]] is a mistake of ancient grammarians. Note that [[δέαλος]] could well have been used in this place. "the presence of [[τε]] after [[σῆμα]] obliges to see [[δέελον]] as a substantive." Hesychius gives the right form. It is derived from [[δέω]] [[bind]], with the suffix <b class="b3">-ελο-</b>, i.e. <b class="b2">*deh₁-elo-</b>. It could have meant (French) [[lien]]. (He also gives another possibility, which seems less probable to me.) Cf. also [[δῆλος]]. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{mdlsj | {{mdlsj |