Anonymous

ὄνομαι: Difference between revisions

From LSJ
m
Text replacement - "(<b class="b2">)([\w\s'-]+)(<\/b>)" to "$2"
m (Text replacement - "(<b class="b2">)([\w\s']+), ([\w\s']+), ([\w\s']+)(<\/b>)" to ", $3, $4")
m (Text replacement - "(<b class="b2">)([\w\s'-]+)(<\/b>)" to "")
Line 29: Line 29:
}}
}}
{{etym
{{etym
|etymtx=Grammatical information: v.<br />Meaning: [[to scold]], [[to blame]], [[to insult]] (Hom., also Hdt.).<br />Other forms: Aor. <b class="b3">ὀνόσ(σ)ασθαι</b> ([[ὤνατο]] P 25; cf. below), fut. <b class="b3">ὀνόσ-σομαι</b>, with <b class="b3">κατα-</b> in <b class="b3">κατ-ώνοντο</b>, <b class="b3">-ονοσθῃ̃ς</b> (Hdt. 2, 172 a. 136).<br />Derivatives: Verbal adj. <b class="b3">ὀνο-τός</b> (Pi., Call., A. R.), <b class="b3">ὀνο-σ-τός</b> (Ι 164, Lyc.; <b class="b3">-σ-</b> analogical, s. Schwyzer 503; cf. also below and Ammann <b class="b3">Μνήμης χάριν</b> 1, 15); dental formation in <b class="b3">ὀνοτ-άζω</b> = [[ὄνομαι]] (h. Merc., Hes., A.); <b class="b3">ὀνητά μεμπτά</b> H., prob. after the oppositum [[ἀγητά]] (if not false for [[ὀνοστά]] with Baunack Phil. 70, 464 f.); [[ὄνοσις]] f. [[blame]] (Eust.).<br />Origin: IE [Indo-European]X [probably] [79] <b class="b2">*h₃enh₃-</b> [[blame]], [[revile]]<br />Etymology: All forms except [[ὤνατο]] (rather aor. then ipf.), <b class="b3">ὄναται ἀτιμάζεται</b> H. and the debated [[οὔνεσθε]] (Ω 241) are based on <b class="b3">ὀνο-</b> (further Schwyzer 681 w. n. 4, ChantraineGramm. hom. 1, 295f. a. 382); <b class="b3">ὀνα-</b> is not an old ablautvariant (Schw. 362, Persson Beitr. 2, 669) but a sec. deviation. -- Without certain non-Greek agreement. Quite hypothetic is the comparison with some Celt. words, e.g. MIr. [[on]] [[shame]], [[anim]] (<b class="b2">a-</b> reduced grade?) [[blemish]], [[fault]]. The comparison with the not quite reliable GAv. ptc. <b class="b2">nadant-</b> [[slandering]], [[reviling]] ([[ἅπ]]. [[λεγ]].) and with Skt. <b class="b2">níndati</b> [[blame]], [[revile]] (as <b class="b2">ní-nd-ati</b>; but rather <b class="b2">ní-n-d-ati</b>, s. [[ὄνειδος]] and Mayrhofer s. <b class="b2">níndati</b> and <b class="b2">nádati</b>) is based on the wrong assumption, that <b class="b3">ὀνόσσ-ασθαι</b>, <b class="b3">-ομαι</b> and [[ὀνοστός]] go back on <b class="b3">ὀνοδ-</b>, instead of being analogical. Uncertain is connection with Hitt. <b class="b2">hanna-</b> [[contend]], [[contest]] Puhvel, Hitt.Et.Dict. 3, 83. -- Details w. older lit. in Bq, WP. 1, 180, Pok. 779, also W.-Hofmann s. [[nota]]. Far remains [[ὄνομα]], s. Bq and W.-Hofmann a. O., also WP. 1, 132. To be rejected also Specht Ursprung 126.
|etymtx=Grammatical information: v.<br />Meaning: [[to scold]], [[to blame]], [[to insult]] (Hom., also Hdt.).<br />Other forms: Aor. <b class="b3">ὀνόσ(σ)ασθαι</b> ([[ὤνατο]] P 25; cf. below), fut. <b class="b3">ὀνόσ-σομαι</b>, with <b class="b3">κατα-</b> in <b class="b3">κατ-ώνοντο</b>, <b class="b3">-ονοσθῃ̃ς</b> (Hdt. 2, 172 a. 136).<br />Derivatives: Verbal adj. <b class="b3">ὀνο-τός</b> (Pi., Call., A. R.), <b class="b3">ὀνο-σ-τός</b> (Ι 164, Lyc.; <b class="b3">-σ-</b> analogical, s. Schwyzer 503; cf. also below and Ammann <b class="b3">Μνήμης χάριν</b> 1, 15); dental formation in <b class="b3">ὀνοτ-άζω</b> = [[ὄνομαι]] (h. Merc., Hes., A.); <b class="b3">ὀνητά μεμπτά</b> H., prob. after the oppositum [[ἀγητά]] (if not false for [[ὀνοστά]] with Baunack Phil. 70, 464 f.); [[ὄνοσις]] f. [[blame]] (Eust.).<br />Origin: IE [Indo-European]X [probably] [79] <b class="b2">*h₃enh₃-</b> [[blame]], [[revile]]<br />Etymology: All forms except [[ὤνατο]] (rather aor. then ipf.), <b class="b3">ὄναται ἀτιμάζεται</b> H. and the debated [[οὔνεσθε]] (Ω 241) are based on <b class="b3">ὀνο-</b> (further Schwyzer 681 w. n. 4, ChantraineGramm. hom. 1, 295f. a. 382); <b class="b3">ὀνα-</b> is not an old ablautvariant (Schw. 362, Persson Beitr. 2, 669) but a sec. deviation. -- Without certain non-Greek agreement. Quite hypothetic is the comparison with some Celt. words, e.g. MIr. [[on]] [[shame]], [[anim]] ([[a-]] reduced grade?) [[blemish]], [[fault]]. The comparison with the not quite reliable GAv. ptc. [[nadant-]] [[slandering]], [[reviling]] ([[ἅπ]]. [[λεγ]].) and with Skt. <b class="b2">níndati</b> [[blame]], [[revile]] (as <b class="b2">ní-nd-ati</b>; but rather <b class="b2">ní-n-d-ati</b>, s. [[ὄνειδος]] and Mayrhofer s. <b class="b2">níndati</b> and <b class="b2">nádati</b>) is based on the wrong assumption, that <b class="b3">ὀνόσσ-ασθαι</b>, <b class="b3">-ομαι</b> and [[ὀνοστός]] go back on <b class="b3">ὀνοδ-</b>, instead of being analogical. Uncertain is connection with Hitt. [[hanna-]] [[contend]], [[contest]] Puhvel, Hitt.Et.Dict. 3, 83. -- Details w. older lit. in Bq, WP. 1, 180, Pok. 779, also W.-Hofmann s. [[nota]]. Far remains [[ὄνομα]], s. Bq and W.-Hofmann a. O., also WP. 1, 132. To be rejected also Specht Ursprung 126.
}}
}}
{{mdlsj
{{mdlsj