οἴγνυμι: Difference between revisions

From LSJ

ἐπ' ἀλλήλοισιν ἀμφικείμενοι → locked in each other's arms, clinging to one another

Source
(3b)
(2b)
Line 4: Line 4:
{{elru
{{elru
|elrutext='''οἴγνῡμι:''' эп. (только praes. act. и 3 л. pl. impf. pass. [[ὠΐγνυντο]]) Hom., Anth. = [[οἴγω]].
|elrutext='''οἴγνῡμι:''' эп. (только praes. act. и 3 л. pl. impf. pass. [[ὠΐγνυντο]]) Hom., Anth. = [[οἴγω]].
}}
{{etym
|etymtx=Grammatical information: v.<br />Meaning: <b class="b2">to open</b>.<br />Other forms: and <b class="b3">οἴγω</b>, Aeol. inf. <b class="b3">ὀείγην</b> (SGDI 214, 43), later also <b class="b3">ἀν-οιγνύω</b> (Demetr. Eloc.), ipf. <b class="b3">ὠΐγνυντο</b> (Β 809, Θ 58), <b class="b3">ἀνα-οίγεσκον</b> (Ω 455), <b class="b3">-ῳ̃γον</b>, <b class="b3">-έῳγον</b>, aor. <b class="b3">οἶξαι</b> (<b class="b3">ᾦξε</b>, <b class="b3">ὤϊξε</b> Hom., <b class="b3">ἀν-έῳξε</b> Hom., Att.), pass. <b class="b3">οἰχθῆναι</b> (Pi., Att.), fut. <b class="b3">οἴξω</b>, perf. <b class="b3">ἀν-έῳγα</b> (intr. Hp. and late), with <b class="b3">-έῳχα</b>, <b class="b3">*έῳγμαι</b> (Att.), <b class="b3">ὤϊκται</b> (Herod.), <b class="b3">ἀν-ῳ̃κται</b> (Theoc.),<br />Compounds: Mostly w. prefix esp. <b class="b3">ἀν-</b>, from which a.o. <b class="b3">ὑπ-</b>, <b class="b3">παρ-ανοίγνυμι</b>, <b class="b3">ὑπ-</b>, <b class="b3">συν-ανοίγω</b> with <b class="b3">ἤνοιγον</b>, <b class="b3">ἤνοιξα</b>, <b class="b3">ἠνοίχθην</b>, <b class="b3">ἠνοίγην</b>, <b class="b3">ἠνέῳξα</b> etc. (X., LXX).<br />Derivatives: Few derivv. <b class="b3">ἄνοιξις</b> f. [[opening]] (Th., Thphr.), <b class="b3">ἄνοιγ-μα</b> n. [[opening]] (LXX), <b class="b3">-εύς</b> m. [[opener]] (Dam. Pr.), <b class="b3">ἐπανοίκ-τωρ</b> (Man.), <b class="b3">-της</b> (Arg. Man.) m. [[springer]]. As 2. member in <b class="b3">πιθ-οίγ-ια</b> n. pl. <b class="b2">opening of a barrel</b>, opening feast of the Anthesterien in Athens (Plu.). The judgment of these forms is partly uncertain and disputable. Starting from the inscriptional attested <b class="b3">ὀείγην</b>, i.e. <b class="b3">ὀ-(Ϝ)είγην</b>, with zero grade <b class="b3">ὠ-(Ϝ)ίγ-νυντο</b> (cf. <b class="b3">ἴγνυντο ἠνοίγοντο</b> H.; very uncertain), Fick and Bechtel (s. Lex. s. v.) want to replace the suspected ep. <b class="b3">ἀναοίγεσκον</b> as well as ep. <b class="b3">ἀνέῳγε</b>, <b class="b3">ἀνέῳξε</b> by <b class="b3">*ἀν-ο-(Ϝ)είγεσκον</b>, <b class="b3">*ἀν-ό-(Ϝ)ειγε</b>, <b class="b3">*ἀν-ό-(Ϝ)ειξε</b>, where <b class="b3">ὀ-</b> would be either prothetic or prefixal (cf. <b class="b3">ὀ-κέλλω</b> and 2. <b class="b3">ὀ-</b>).<br />Origin: IE [Indo-European] [1130] <b class="b2">*h₃u̯eig-</b> <b class="b2">make give way</b><br />Etymology: The judgment of these forms is partly uncertain and disputable. Starting from the inscriptional attested <b class="b3">ὀείγην</b>, i.e. <b class="b3">ὀ-(Ϝ)είγην</b>, with zero grade <b class="b3">ὠ-(Ϝ)ίγ-νυντο</b> (cf. <b class="b3">ἴγνυντο ἠνοίγοντο</b> H.; very uncertain), Fick and Bechtel (s. Lex. s. v.) want to replace the suspected ep. <b class="b3">ἀναοίγεσκον</b> as well as ep. <b class="b3">ἀνέῳγε</b>, <b class="b3">ἀνέῳξε</b> by <b class="b3">*ἀν-ο-(Ϝ)είγεσκον</b>, <b class="b3">*ἀν-ό-(Ϝ)ειγε</b>, <b class="b3">*ἀν-ό-(Ϝ)ειξε</b>, where <b class="b3">ὀ-</b> would be either prothetic or prefixal (cf. <b class="b3">ὀ-κέλλω</b> and 2. <b class="b3">ὀ-</b>). Not certainly explained. With <b class="b3">Ϝιγ-</b>, <b class="b3">Ϝειγ-</b> agree formally Skt. (midd.) <b class="b2">vij-áte</b>, <b class="b2">vej-ate</b> <b class="b2">give ground, flee</b>, to which a.o. Skt. <b class="b2">véga-</b> = Av. <b class="b2">vaēγa-</b> m. (IE <b class="b2">*u̯óigo-s</b>) <b class="b2">violent movement, pressure, clash, blow</b> (further s. <b class="b3">εἴκω</b>); so <b class="b3">ὀ-(Ϝ)εί-γω</b>, <b class="b3">ὀ-(Ϝε)ίγ-νυμι</b> prop. <b class="b2">make give way, push, open (a door)</b>? (Bechtel Lex. s.v. after Wackernagel). -- Diff., hardly to be preferred, Brugmann IF 29, 238 ff.: from <b class="b3">*Ϝο-(ε)ιγ-</b> to <b class="b3">ἐπ-είγω</b> with the same prefix as in <b class="b3">Ϝο-φληκόσι</b>, s. [[ὀφείλω]]. -- On the individual forms cf. Schwyzer 653 n. 10 w. lit. (also 412, 434 w. n. 3, 772), Chantraine Gramm. hom. 1. 152, 303 a. 480. S. also [[ἐπῳχατο]]. The analysis leads to <b class="b2">*h₃u̯(e)ig-</b>.
}}
}}

Revision as of 05:45, 3 January 2019

French (Bailly abrégé)

seul. prés. Act. et impf. Pass. 3ᵉ pl. épq. ὠίγνυντο;
c. οἴγω.

Russian (Dvoretsky)

οἴγνῡμι: эп. (только praes. act. и 3 л. pl. impf. pass. ὠΐγνυντο) Hom., Anth. = οἴγω.

Frisk Etymological English

Grammatical information: v.
Meaning: to open.
Other forms: and οἴγω, Aeol. inf. ὀείγην (SGDI 214, 43), later also ἀν-οιγνύω (Demetr. Eloc.), ipf. ὠΐγνυντο (Β 809, Θ 58), ἀνα-οίγεσκον (Ω 455), -ῳ̃γον, -έῳγον, aor. οἶξαι (ᾦξε, ὤϊξε Hom., ἀν-έῳξε Hom., Att.), pass. οἰχθῆναι (Pi., Att.), fut. οἴξω, perf. ἀν-έῳγα (intr. Hp. and late), with -έῳχα, *έῳγμαι (Att.), ὤϊκται (Herod.), ἀν-ῳ̃κται (Theoc.),
Compounds: Mostly w. prefix esp. ἀν-, from which a.o. ὑπ-, παρ-ανοίγνυμι, ὑπ-, συν-ανοίγω with ἤνοιγον, ἤνοιξα, ἠνοίχθην, ἠνοίγην, ἠνέῳξα etc. (X., LXX).
Derivatives: Few derivv. ἄνοιξις f. opening (Th., Thphr.), ἄνοιγ-μα n. opening (LXX), -εύς m. opener (Dam. Pr.), ἐπανοίκ-τωρ (Man.), -της (Arg. Man.) m. springer. As 2. member in πιθ-οίγ-ια n. pl. opening of a barrel, opening feast of the Anthesterien in Athens (Plu.). The judgment of these forms is partly uncertain and disputable. Starting from the inscriptional attested ὀείγην, i.e. ὀ-(Ϝ)είγην, with zero grade ὠ-(Ϝ)ίγ-νυντο (cf. ἴγνυντο ἠνοίγοντο H.; very uncertain), Fick and Bechtel (s. Lex. s. v.) want to replace the suspected ep. ἀναοίγεσκον as well as ep. ἀνέῳγε, ἀνέῳξε by *ἀν-ο-(Ϝ)είγεσκον, *ἀν-ό-(Ϝ)ειγε, *ἀν-ό-(Ϝ)ειξε, where ὀ- would be either prothetic or prefixal (cf. ὀ-κέλλω and 2. ὀ-).
Origin: IE [Indo-European] [1130] *h₃u̯eig- make give way
Etymology: The judgment of these forms is partly uncertain and disputable. Starting from the inscriptional attested ὀείγην, i.e. ὀ-(Ϝ)είγην, with zero grade ὠ-(Ϝ)ίγ-νυντο (cf. ἴγνυντο ἠνοίγοντο H.; very uncertain), Fick and Bechtel (s. Lex. s. v.) want to replace the suspected ep. ἀναοίγεσκον as well as ep. ἀνέῳγε, ἀνέῳξε by *ἀν-ο-(Ϝ)είγεσκον, *ἀν-ό-(Ϝ)ειγε, *ἀν-ό-(Ϝ)ειξε, where ὀ- would be either prothetic or prefixal (cf. ὀ-κέλλω and 2. ὀ-). Not certainly explained. With Ϝιγ-, Ϝειγ- agree formally Skt. (midd.) vij-áte, vej-ate give ground, flee, to which a.o. Skt. véga- = Av. vaēγa- m. (IE *u̯óigo-s) violent movement, pressure, clash, blow (further s. εἴκω); so ὀ-(Ϝ)εί-γω, ὀ-(Ϝε)ίγ-νυμι prop. make give way, push, open (a door)? (Bechtel Lex. s.v. after Wackernagel). -- Diff., hardly to be preferred, Brugmann IF 29, 238 ff.: from *Ϝο-(ε)ιγ- to ἐπ-είγω with the same prefix as in Ϝο-φληκόσι, s. ὀφείλω. -- On the individual forms cf. Schwyzer 653 n. 10 w. lit. (also 412, 434 w. n. 3, 772), Chantraine Gramm. hom. 1. 152, 303 a. 480. S. also ἐπῳχατο. The analysis leads to *h₃u̯(e)ig-.