οὐ γάρ: Difference between revisions
From LSJ
τὸ τῶν νικητόρων στρατόπεδον → Victorious Legion
mNo edit summary |
m (LSJ1 replacement) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|Transliteration C=ou gar | |Transliteration C=ou gar | ||
|Beta Code=ou)ga/r | |Beta Code=ou)ga/r | ||
|Definition=in orat. recta, < | |Definition=in orat. recta,<br><span class="bld">A</span> [[for not]], in assigning a negative reason, Il. 22.438, etc.: other Particles are sometimes put between, as οὐ μὲν γάρ 5.402; <b class="b3">οὐ γάρ</b>, in assent to a neg., [[no indeed]], Pl. ''Tht.''150a, etc.<br><span class="bld">II</span> elliptic, in interrog. replies, where [[yes]] or [[well]] must be supplied, <b class="b3">τούτους ἀγαθοὺς ἐνόμισας;—οὐ γάρ</b>…; yes (or well), and aren't they? Ar. ''Pax''970.<br><span class="bld">2</span> in questions, where an affirm. answer is expected, <b class="b3">οὐ γὰρ ὁ Παφλαγὼν ἀπέκρυπτε ταύτας</b>;did [[not]] he keep them hidden? Id.''Eq.''1392, cf. D.22.73, etc. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{eles | {{eles | ||
|esgtx=[[pues no]], [[nada de eso]] | |esgtx=[[pues no]], [[nada de eso]] | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:18, 25 August 2023
English (LSJ)
in orat. recta,
A for not, in assigning a negative reason, Il. 22.438, etc.: other Particles are sometimes put between, as οὐ μὲν γάρ 5.402; οὐ γάρ, in assent to a neg., no indeed, Pl. Tht.150a, etc.
II elliptic, in interrog. replies, where yes or well must be supplied, τούτους ἀγαθοὺς ἐνόμισας;—οὐ γάρ…; yes (or well), and aren't they? Ar. Pax970.
2 in questions, where an affirm. answer is expected, οὐ γὰρ ὁ Παφλαγὼν ἀπέκρυπτε ταύτας;did not he keep them hidden? Id.Eq.1392, cf. D.22.73, etc.
