soloecismus: Difference between revisions
(6_15) |
m (Text replacement - "]]>" to "]]") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Lewis | {{Lewis | ||
|lshtext=<b>sŏloecismus</b>: (sŏlĭcismus, Aus. Epigr. 138), i, m., = [[σολοικισμός]] | |lshtext=<b>sŏloecismus</b>: (sŏlĭcismus, Aus. Epigr. 138), i, m., = [[σολοικισμός]].<br /><b>I</b> Lit., a grammatical [[fault]] in the [[construction]] of a [[sentence]], a [[solecism]] (cf. [[stribligo]]): vitia in sermone, quo [[minus]] is [[Latinus]] [[sit]], duo possunt esse: [[soloecismus]] et [[barbarismus]]. Soloecismus est, cum in verbis pluribus [[consequens]] [[verbum]] superiori non accommodatur. Barbarismus est, cum [[verbum]] aliquod [[vitiose]] effertur, Auct. Her. 4, 12, 17; cf. Sinn. [[Capito]] ap. Gell. 5, 20, 1 ([[who]] called it, in [[pure]] Latin, [[imparilitas]]); Quint. 1, 5, 16; 1, 5, 36 sq.; Sen. Suas. 2, § 13; Gell. 1, 7, 3; Juv. 6, 452; Aus. Epigr. 138; Tert. adv. Nat. 1, 3.—<br /><b>II</b> Transf., a [[fault]], in gen., Mart. 11, 19, 2: [[apud]] Christianos [[soloecismus]] est [[magnus]] et [[vitium]], turpe [[quid]] vel narrare vel facere, Hier. in Helv. 16. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 09:34, 13 August 2017
Latin > English (Lewis & Short)
sŏloecismus: (sŏlĭcismus, Aus. Epigr. 138), i, m., = σολοικισμός.
I Lit., a grammatical fault in the construction of a sentence, a solecism (cf. stribligo): vitia in sermone, quo minus is Latinus sit, duo possunt esse: soloecismus et barbarismus. Soloecismus est, cum in verbis pluribus consequens verbum superiori non accommodatur. Barbarismus est, cum verbum aliquod vitiose effertur, Auct. Her. 4, 12, 17; cf. Sinn. Capito ap. Gell. 5, 20, 1 (who called it, in pure Latin, imparilitas); Quint. 1, 5, 16; 1, 5, 36 sq.; Sen. Suas. 2, § 13; Gell. 1, 7, 3; Juv. 6, 452; Aus. Epigr. 138; Tert. adv. Nat. 1, 3.—
II Transf., a fault, in gen., Mart. 11, 19, 2: apud Christianos soloecismus est magnus et vitium, turpe quid vel narrare vel facere, Hier. in Helv. 16.
