κρατευταί: Difference between revisions
διὸ δὴ πᾶς ἀνὴρ σπουδαῖος τῶν ὄντων σπουδαίων πέρι πολλοῦ δεῖ μὴ γράψας ποτὲ ἐν ἀνθρώποις εἰς φθόνον καὶ ἀπορίαν καταβαλεῖ → And this is the reason why every serious man in dealing with really serious subjects carefully avoids writing, lest thereby he may possibly cast them as a prey to the envy and stupidity of the public | Therefore every man of worth, when dealing with matters of worth, will be far from exposing them to ill feeling and misunderstanding among men by committing them to writing
(3) |
(2) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
{{elru | {{elru | ||
|elrutext='''κρᾰτευταί:''' οἱ подставка для вертела Hom. | |elrutext='''κρᾰτευταί:''' οἱ подставка для вертела Hom. | ||
}} | |||
{{etym | |||
|etymtx=Grammatical information: m. pl.<br />Meaning: <b class="b2">stone or metal blocks on both sides of the altar on which the spits rested</b> (I 214, Eup., Att. inscr.; Chapouthier Rev. Ét. anc. 43, 12ff.); also <b class="b2">support of a pavement</b> (Lebadea).<br />Other forms: <b class="b3">κραδαυταί</b> Att. inscr. (Solmsen KZ42, 221ff.).<br />Derivatives: <b class="b3">κρατευτήρια</b> pl. <b class="b2">id.</b> (Poll. 6, 89; after the nom. instr. in <b class="b3">-τήριον</b>).<br />Origin: PG [a word of Pre-Greek origin]<br />Etymology: The connection of Fick KZ 22, 230 with <b class="b3">κράτος</b>, <b class="b3">κρατύς</b> and <b class="b3">τελευτή</b> leads nowhere; cf. Aristarchus: <b class="b3">ἀπὸ τοῦ διακρατεῖσθαι τοὺς ὀβελίσκους ἐπὶ τούτων</b> (<b class="b3">τῶν βάσεων</b>) <b class="b3">κειμένους</b>. Also an assumed verb <b class="b3">κρατεύω</b> = <b class="b3">κρατύνω</b> <b class="b2">make fest</b> (?) does not help. The rare by-form <b class="b3">κραδευταί</b> (Att. inscr.; cf. Solmsen KZ 42, 221 ff.) cannot be explained as folketymological transformation after <b class="b3">κραδάω</b>; the other way round does not give a solution either. Fur. 181 concludes rightly to a loan, with <b class="b3">δ</b> \/ <b class="b3">τ</b>, esp. as <b class="b3">βασκευταί</b> is also clearly a foreign loan. | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 02:22, 3 January 2019
English (LSJ)
ῶν, οἱ,
A stone or metal blocks on which a spit rests, Il.9.214, cf. Sch., Paus.Gr.Fr.236; μολύβδινοι κ. Eup.171, cf. IG22.1425.388 (written κραδευταί ib.1425.415, 1541.20). 2 in Archit., stones which support a pavement, ib.7.3073.105, al.(Lebad.). 3 leaden pigs of specified weight, IG12.371.13.
Greek (Liddell-Scott)
κρᾰτευταί: -ῶν, οἱ, αἱ βάσεις, ἐφ’ ὧν οἱ ὀβελοὶ τίθενται πρὸς ὄπτησιν, πάσσε δ’ ἁλὸς θείοιο, κρατευτάων ἐπαείρας, «τῶν βάσεων, ὅ ἐστι τῶν λίθων ἐφ’ ὧν οἱ ὀβελίσκοι τίθενται ὀπτωμένων τῶν κρεῶν» Σχόλ., Ἰλ. Ι. 214, ἔνθα ἴδε Spitzn· μολύβδιναι κρ. Εὔπολ. ἐν «Κόλαξι» 22: ― ὡσαύτως κρᾰτευτήριον, τό, ἢ κρατευτήρια, τά, Πολυδ. Ϛ΄, 89, Ι΄, 97.
French (Bailly abrégé)
ῶν (οἱ) :
sorte de chenets en pierre ou en fer pour soutenir la broche.
Étymologie: κρατέω.
English (Autenrieth)
explained by Aristarchus as head-stones, on which the spits were rested in roasting meat; cf. our ‘fire-dogs,’ ‘andirons.’ Possibly the shape was like the horns (κέρας) on the altar in cut No. 95. Il. 9.214†.
Greek Monotonic
κρᾰτευταί: -ῶν, οἱ, βάσεις ή σκελετός πάνω στον οποίο γυρνούσαν οι σούβλες, σε Ομήρ. Ιλ. (αμφίβ. προέλ.).
Dutch (Woordenboekgrieks.nl)
κρατευταί -ῶν, οἱ [~ κράτος?] stutten.
Russian (Dvoretsky)
κρᾰτευταί: οἱ подставка для вертела Hom.
Frisk Etymological English
Grammatical information: m. pl.
Meaning: stone or metal blocks on both sides of the altar on which the spits rested (I 214, Eup., Att. inscr.; Chapouthier Rev. Ét. anc. 43, 12ff.); also support of a pavement (Lebadea).
Other forms: κραδαυταί Att. inscr. (Solmsen KZ42, 221ff.).
Derivatives: κρατευτήρια pl. id. (Poll. 6, 89; after the nom. instr. in -τήριον).
Origin: PG [a word of Pre-Greek origin]
Etymology: The connection of Fick KZ 22, 230 with κράτος, κρατύς and τελευτή leads nowhere; cf. Aristarchus: ἀπὸ τοῦ διακρατεῖσθαι τοὺς ὀβελίσκους ἐπὶ τούτων (τῶν βάσεων) κειμένους. Also an assumed verb κρατεύω = κρατύνω make fest (?) does not help. The rare by-form κραδευταί (Att. inscr.; cf. Solmsen KZ 42, 221 ff.) cannot be explained as folketymological transformation after κραδάω; the other way round does not give a solution either. Fur. 181 concludes rightly to a loan, with δ \/ τ, esp. as βασκευταί is also clearly a foreign loan.
