num: Difference between revisions
Ἡ γλῶσσ' ἁμαρτάνουσα τἀληθῆ λέγει → Inesse linquae veritas lapsae solet → Die Zunge, wenn sie in die Irre geht, spricht wahr
(6_11) |
(D_6) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Lewis | {{Lewis | ||
|lshtext=<b>num</b>: adv. an acc. m., of [[which]] nam is the acc. f., an interrog. [[particle]], [[usually]] implying [[that]] a [[negative]] [[answer]] is [[expected]].<br /><b>I</b> In a [[direct]] [[interrogation]] (no corresp. [[term]] in English).<br /> <b>(a)</b> Num esse amicum suspicari [[visus]] est? Plaut. Merc. 1, 2, 102; Ter. And. 2, 2, 29: num [[igitur]] tot ducum [[naufragium]] sustulit artem gubernandi? aut num imperatorum [[scientia]] [[nihil]] est, [[quia]], etc., Cic. Div. 1, 14, 24: num exspectatis, dum L. [[Metellus]] [[testimonium]] dicat? id. Verr. 2, 3, 53, § 122; id. Rep. 1, 11, 17: num barbarorum [[Romulus]] rex fuit? id. ib. 1, 37, 58.—<br /> <b>(b)</b> Followed by an, contmuing the [[inquiry]]: num furis, an [[prudens]] ludis me obscura canendo? Hor. S. 2, 5, 58: num iratum timemus Jovem? ... an ne [[turpiter]] faceret, Cic. Off. 3, 28, 102.—<br /> <b>(g)</b> Esp., [[with]] [[quis]], [[quando]] ( = [[aliquis]], [[aliquando]]): [[numquis]] hic est? [[nemo]] est, Ter. Eun. 3, 5, 1: num quae [[trepidatio]]? num qui [[tumultus]]? Cic. Deiot. 7, 20: num [[quando]] perditis civibus [[vexillum]] defuturum putatis? id. Phil. 5, 11, 29.—<br /> <b>(d)</b> Num [[quid]] (also [[numquid]]) vis? do [[you]] [[wish]] [[any]] [[thing]] [[further]]? is [[there]] [[any]] [[thing]] [[else]]? a [[very]] [[common]] form of [[leave]]-[[taking]], Plaut. Am. 1, 3, 44; 46; 3, 3, 15 et saep.; cf. Ter. Eun. 2, 3, 49 [[Don]].; Cic. Att. 6, 3, 6; 5, 2, 2; Liv. 6, 34, 7; for [[which]], also: [[numquid]] me vis? Plaut. Cist. 1, 1, 119; id. Mil. 2, 6, 92; and elliptically: [[numquid]] me? Plaut. Poen. 3, 6, 6. —（ε) Numquid is also used adverbially; v. [[numquid]].—（ζ) Joined to nam and ne [[numnam]], numne, in [[anxious]] and surprised [[inquiry]]: eho [[numnam]] hic [[relictus]] [[custos]]? Ter. Eun. 2, 2, 55: numne vis me [[ire]] ad cenam? Plaut. Truc. 2, 6, 65: deum ipsum numne vidisti? Cic. N. D. 1, 31, 88; id. Lael. 11, 36 (so B. and K., Halm. But Ritschl, Opusc. 2, 248, denies the Latinity of the form numne; cf. Hand, Turs. 4, 79; and, [[contra]], Rib. Lat. Part. p. 13).—<br /><b>II</b> In an [[indirect]] [[interrogation]], [[whether]]: [[quaero]], num [[aliter]] ac [[nunc]] eveniunt, evenirent? Cic. Fat. 3, 6: videte, num dubitandum [[vobis]] [[sit]], omni [[studio]] ad id [[bellum]] incumbere, id. Imp. Pomp. 7, 19: jusserunt speculari, num sollicitati animi sociorum essent, Liv. 42, 19: exsistit hoc [[loco]] quaedam [[quaestio]] [[subdifficilis]]: num [[quando]] amici [[novi]], digni amicitiā veteribus sint anteponendi, Cic. Lael. 19, 67; so, num [[quando]], id. Phil. 5, 11, 29; id. Vatin. 6, 17: num [[quis]], id. Att. 13, 8; id. Clu. 38, 105; id. Off. 1, 3, 7: videamus [[ergo]], num [[expositio]] haec longior [[demum]] esse debeat, [[whether]] this [[explanation]] should not be a [[little]] [[longer]] [[still]], Quint. 4, 2, 79: [[consultus]], num et ... vellet, [[whether]] he did not also [[wish]], Suet. Aug. 18. | |lshtext=<b>num</b>: adv. an acc. m., of [[which]] nam is the acc. f., an interrog. [[particle]], [[usually]] implying [[that]] a [[negative]] [[answer]] is [[expected]].<br /><b>I</b> In a [[direct]] [[interrogation]] (no corresp. [[term]] in English).<br /> <b>(a)</b> Num esse amicum suspicari [[visus]] est? Plaut. Merc. 1, 2, 102; Ter. And. 2, 2, 29: num [[igitur]] tot ducum [[naufragium]] sustulit artem gubernandi? aut num imperatorum [[scientia]] [[nihil]] est, [[quia]], etc., Cic. Div. 1, 14, 24: num exspectatis, dum L. [[Metellus]] [[testimonium]] dicat? id. Verr. 2, 3, 53, § 122; id. Rep. 1, 11, 17: num barbarorum [[Romulus]] rex fuit? id. ib. 1, 37, 58.—<br /> <b>(b)</b> Followed by an, contmuing the [[inquiry]]: num furis, an [[prudens]] ludis me obscura canendo? Hor. S. 2, 5, 58: num iratum timemus Jovem? ... an ne [[turpiter]] faceret, Cic. Off. 3, 28, 102.—<br /> <b>(g)</b> Esp., [[with]] [[quis]], [[quando]] ( = [[aliquis]], [[aliquando]]): [[numquis]] hic est? [[nemo]] est, Ter. Eun. 3, 5, 1: num quae [[trepidatio]]? num qui [[tumultus]]? Cic. Deiot. 7, 20: num [[quando]] perditis civibus [[vexillum]] defuturum putatis? id. Phil. 5, 11, 29.—<br /> <b>(d)</b> Num [[quid]] (also [[numquid]]) vis? do [[you]] [[wish]] [[any]] [[thing]] [[further]]? is [[there]] [[any]] [[thing]] [[else]]? a [[very]] [[common]] form of [[leave]]-[[taking]], Plaut. Am. 1, 3, 44; 46; 3, 3, 15 et saep.; cf. Ter. Eun. 2, 3, 49 [[Don]].; Cic. Att. 6, 3, 6; 5, 2, 2; Liv. 6, 34, 7; for [[which]], also: [[numquid]] me vis? Plaut. Cist. 1, 1, 119; id. Mil. 2, 6, 92; and elliptically: [[numquid]] me? Plaut. Poen. 3, 6, 6. —（ε) Numquid is also used adverbially; v. [[numquid]].—（ζ) Joined to nam and ne [[numnam]], numne, in [[anxious]] and surprised [[inquiry]]: eho [[numnam]] hic [[relictus]] [[custos]]? Ter. Eun. 2, 2, 55: numne vis me [[ire]] ad cenam? Plaut. Truc. 2, 6, 65: deum ipsum numne vidisti? Cic. N. D. 1, 31, 88; id. Lael. 11, 36 (so B. and K., Halm. But Ritschl, Opusc. 2, 248, denies the Latinity of the form numne; cf. Hand, Turs. 4, 79; and, [[contra]], Rib. Lat. Part. p. 13).—<br /><b>II</b> In an [[indirect]] [[interrogation]], [[whether]]: [[quaero]], num [[aliter]] ac [[nunc]] eveniunt, evenirent? Cic. Fat. 3, 6: videte, num dubitandum [[vobis]] [[sit]], omni [[studio]] ad id [[bellum]] incumbere, id. Imp. Pomp. 7, 19: jusserunt speculari, num sollicitati animi sociorum essent, Liv. 42, 19: exsistit hoc [[loco]] quaedam [[quaestio]] [[subdifficilis]]: num [[quando]] amici [[novi]], digni amicitiā veteribus sint anteponendi, Cic. Lael. 19, 67; so, num [[quando]], id. Phil. 5, 11, 29; id. Vatin. 6, 17: num [[quis]], id. Att. 13, 8; id. Clu. 38, 105; id. Off. 1, 3, 7: videamus [[ergo]], num [[expositio]] haec longior [[demum]] esse debeat, [[whether]] this [[explanation]] should not be a [[little]] [[longer]] [[still]], Quint. 4, 2, 79: [[consultus]], num et ... vellet, [[whether]] he did not also [[wish]], Suet. Aug. 18. | ||
}} | |||
{{Gaffiot | |||
|gf=<b>num</b>,⁷ adv. (num, maintenant, cf. [[etiamnum]], [[nunc]]), sert à interroger, [[est]]-ce que par hasard ?<br /> <b>I</b> [int. dir., de forme, équivalant à une nég.]<br /><b>1</b> num [[tot]] ducum [[naufragium]] sustulit artem gubernandi ? [[aut]] num... ? Cic. Div. 1, 24, [[est]]-ce que les naufrages de tant de chefs ont supprimé l’art de la navigation ? ou encore [[est]]-ce que...? || [au lieu de num répété, on trouve an ] ou bien [[est]]-ce que plutôt, cf. Cic. CM 23 ; Tusc. 1, 112<br /><b>2</b> num [[quis]], num qui, num quæ, etc., [[est]]-ce que qqn, [[est]]-ce que qque, [[est]]-ce que qqne, cf. Cic. Dej. 20, etc. ; num [[quando]] Cic. Phil. 5, 29, [[est]]-ce que parfois, [[est]]-ce que jamais ? num [[quid]] [[vis]] ? veux-tu encore qqch. ? Pl. Amph. 344, etc. ; Hor. S. 1, 9, 6 [formule pour prendre congé, « tu n’as [[plus]] [[rien]] à me [[dire]] ? », cf. Ter. Eun. 341 ; Cic. Att. 5, 2, 2 ; 6, 3, 6 ], ou encore num [[quid]] me [[vis]] ? Pl. Cist. 119 ; Mil. 575, ou [[numquid]] me ? Pl. Pœn. 801 || numquisnam, [[est]]-ce que vraiment qqn ? Cic. Amer. 107 ; Phil. 6, 12 || v. [[numquid]] adv. et [[numquidnam]]<br /><b>3</b> num [[nam]] ? [[est]]-ce que vraiment ? [[est]]-ce que donc ? cf. Pl. Amph. 321 ; 1073 ; Aul. 389 ; Ter. Eun. 286<br /><b>4</b> numne, [[est]]-ce que par hasard : Cic. Nat. 1, 88 ; Læl. 36.<br /> <b>II</b> [interr. ind.] quæro, num... Cic. Fato 6, je demande si... ; videte, num... Cic. Pomp. 19, voyez si... ; quæstio [[est]], num ; rogare, num, la question [[est]] de savoir si, demander si : Cic. Læl. 67 ; Q. 2, 2, 1. | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 06:59, 14 August 2017
Latin > English (Lewis & Short)
num: adv. an acc. m., of which nam is the acc. f., an interrog. particle, usually implying that a negative answer is expected.
I In a direct interrogation (no corresp. term in English).
(a) Num esse amicum suspicari visus est? Plaut. Merc. 1, 2, 102; Ter. And. 2, 2, 29: num igitur tot ducum naufragium sustulit artem gubernandi? aut num imperatorum scientia nihil est, quia, etc., Cic. Div. 1, 14, 24: num exspectatis, dum L. Metellus testimonium dicat? id. Verr. 2, 3, 53, § 122; id. Rep. 1, 11, 17: num barbarorum Romulus rex fuit? id. ib. 1, 37, 58.—
(b) Followed by an, contmuing the inquiry: num furis, an prudens ludis me obscura canendo? Hor. S. 2, 5, 58: num iratum timemus Jovem? ... an ne turpiter faceret, Cic. Off. 3, 28, 102.—
(g) Esp., with quis, quando ( = aliquis, aliquando): numquis hic est? nemo est, Ter. Eun. 3, 5, 1: num quae trepidatio? num qui tumultus? Cic. Deiot. 7, 20: num quando perditis civibus vexillum defuturum putatis? id. Phil. 5, 11, 29.—
(d) Num quid (also numquid) vis? do you wish any thing further? is there any thing else? a very common form of leave-taking, Plaut. Am. 1, 3, 44; 46; 3, 3, 15 et saep.; cf. Ter. Eun. 2, 3, 49 Don.; Cic. Att. 6, 3, 6; 5, 2, 2; Liv. 6, 34, 7; for which, also: numquid me vis? Plaut. Cist. 1, 1, 119; id. Mil. 2, 6, 92; and elliptically: numquid me? Plaut. Poen. 3, 6, 6. —（ε) Numquid is also used adverbially; v. numquid.—（ζ) Joined to nam and ne numnam, numne, in anxious and surprised inquiry: eho numnam hic relictus custos? Ter. Eun. 2, 2, 55: numne vis me ire ad cenam? Plaut. Truc. 2, 6, 65: deum ipsum numne vidisti? Cic. N. D. 1, 31, 88; id. Lael. 11, 36 (so B. and K., Halm. But Ritschl, Opusc. 2, 248, denies the Latinity of the form numne; cf. Hand, Turs. 4, 79; and, contra, Rib. Lat. Part. p. 13).—
II In an indirect interrogation, whether: quaero, num aliter ac nunc eveniunt, evenirent? Cic. Fat. 3, 6: videte, num dubitandum vobis sit, omni studio ad id bellum incumbere, id. Imp. Pomp. 7, 19: jusserunt speculari, num sollicitati animi sociorum essent, Liv. 42, 19: exsistit hoc loco quaedam quaestio subdifficilis: num quando amici novi, digni amicitiā veteribus sint anteponendi, Cic. Lael. 19, 67; so, num quando, id. Phil. 5, 11, 29; id. Vatin. 6, 17: num quis, id. Att. 13, 8; id. Clu. 38, 105; id. Off. 1, 3, 7: videamus ergo, num expositio haec longior demum esse debeat, whether this explanation should not be a little longer still, Quint. 4, 2, 79: consultus, num et ... vellet, whether he did not also wish, Suet. Aug. 18.
Latin > French (Gaffiot 2016)
num,⁷ adv. (num, maintenant, cf. etiamnum, nunc), sert à interroger, est-ce que par hasard ?
I [int. dir., de forme, équivalant à une nég.]
1 num tot ducum naufragium sustulit artem gubernandi ? aut num... ? Cic. Div. 1, 24, est-ce que les naufrages de tant de chefs ont supprimé l’art de la navigation ? ou encore est-ce que...?
