num

Latin > English (Lewis & Short)

num: adv. an acc. m., of which nam is the acc. f., an interrog. particle, usually implying that a negative answer is expected.
I In a direct interrogation (no corresp. term in English).
   (a)    Num esse amicum suspicari visus est? Plaut. Merc. 1, 2, 102; Ter. And. 2, 2, 29: num igitur tot ducum naufragium sustulit artem gubernandi? aut num imperatorum scientia nihil est, quia, etc., Cic. Div. 1, 14, 24: num exspectatis, dum L. Metellus testimonium dicat? id. Verr. 2, 3, 53, § 122; id. Rep. 1, 11, 17: num barbarorum Romulus rex fuit? id. ib. 1, 37, 58.—
   (b)    Followed by an, contmuing the inquiry: num furis, an prudens ludis me obscura canendo? Hor. S. 2, 5, 58: num iratum timemus Jovem? ... an ne turpiter faceret, Cic. Off. 3, 28, 102.—
   (g)    Esp., with quis, quando ( = aliquis, aliquando): numquis hic est? nemo est, Ter. Eun. 3, 5, 1: num quae trepidatio? num qui tumultus? Cic. Deiot. 7, 20: num quando perditis civibus vexillum defuturum putatis? id. Phil. 5, 11, 29.—
   (d)    Num quid (also numquid) vis? do you wish any thing further? is there any thing else? a very common form of leave-taking, Plaut. Am. 1, 3, 44; 46; 3, 3, 15 et saep.; cf. Ter. Eun. 2, 3, 49 Don.; Cic. Att. 6, 3, 6; 5, 2, 2; Liv. 6, 34, 7; for which, also: numquid me vis? Plaut. Cist. 1, 1, 119; id. Mil. 2, 6, 92; and elliptically: numquid me? Plaut. Poen. 3, 6, 6. —（ε) Numquid is also used adverbially; v. numquid.—（ζ) Joined to nam and ne numnam, numne, in anxious and surprised inquiry: eho numnam hic relictus custos? Ter. Eun. 2, 2, 55: numne vis me ire ad cenam? Plaut. Truc. 2, 6, 65: deum ipsum numne vidisti? Cic. N. D. 1, 31, 88; id. Lael. 11, 36 (so B. and K., Halm. But Ritschl, Opusc. 2, 248, denies the Latinity of the form numne; cf. Hand, Turs. 4, 79; and, contra, Rib. Lat. Part. p. 13).—
II In an indirect interrogation, whether: quaero, num aliter ac nunc eveniunt, evenirent? Cic. Fat. 3, 6: videte, num dubitandum vobis sit, omni studio ad id bellum incumbere, id. Imp. Pomp. 7, 19: jusserunt speculari, num sollicitati animi sociorum essent, Liv. 42, 19: exsistit hoc loco quaedam quaestio subdifficilis: num quando amici novi, digni amicitiā veteribus sint anteponendi, Cic. Lael. 19, 67; so, num quando, id. Phil. 5, 11, 29; id. Vatin. 6, 17: num quis, id. Att. 13, 8; id. Clu. 38, 105; id. Off. 1, 3, 7: videamus ergo, num expositio haec longior demum esse debeat, whether this explanation should not be a little longer still, Quint. 4, 2, 79: consultus, num et ... vellet, whether he did not also wish, Suet. Aug. 18.

Latin > French (Gaffiot 2016)

num,⁷ adv. (num, maintenant, cf. etiamnum, nunc), sert à interroger, est-ce que par hasard ?
    I [int. dir., de forme, équivalant à une nég.]
1 num tot ducum naufragium sustulit artem gubernandi ? aut num... ? Cic. Div. 1, 24, est-ce que les naufrages de tant de chefs ont supprimé l’art de la navigation ? ou encore est-ce que...? || [au lieu de num répété, on trouve an ] ou bien est-ce que plutôt, cf. Cic. CM 23 ; Tusc. 1, 112
2 num quis, num qui, num quæ, etc., est-ce que qqn, est-ce que qque, est-ce que qqne, cf. Cic. Dej. 20, etc. ; num quando Cic. Phil. 5, 29, est-ce que parfois, est-ce que jamais ? num quid vis ? veux-tu encore qqch. ? Pl. Amph. 344, etc. ; Hor. S. 1, 9, 6 [formule pour prendre congé, « tu n’as plus rien à me dire ? », cf. Ter. Eun. 341 ; Cic. Att. 5, 2, 2 ; 6, 3, 6 ], ou encore num quid me vis ? Pl. Cist. 119 ; Mil. 575, ou numquid me ? Pl. Pœn. 801 || numquisnam, est-ce que vraiment qqn ? Cic. Amer. 107 ; Phil. 6, 12 || v. numquid adv. et numquidnam
3 num nam ? est-ce que vraiment ? est-ce que donc ? cf. Pl. Amph. 321 ; 1073 ; Aul. 389 ; Ter. Eun. 286
4 numne, est-ce que par hasard : Cic. Nat. 1, 88 ; Læl. 36.
    II [interr. ind.] quæro, num... Cic. Fato 6, je demande si... ; videte, num... Cic. Pomp. 19, voyez si... ; quæstio est, num ; rogare, num, la question est de savoir si, demander si : Cic. Læl. 67 ; Q. 2, 2, 1.